Obama supposedly recently denounced the comments by his pastor of 20 years, the pastor who married him and baptized his kids. ONLY after the media found out about this wacko, anti-Semitic, racist, gyrating monkey did Obama have him leave his campaign. Jeremiah Wright thinks the U.S. invented the AIDS virus, thinks American is a “damned” place, and thinks that white people are evil. Here are some of his racist comments, while the crowd eats it up without thinking for themselves. What a bunch of idiots:

David Bernstein points out how this church is so racist and evil and anti-American that it worships people who think that white people are the devil! Idiots:

There is no denying, however, that a strand of radical black political theology influences Trinity. James Cone, the pioneer of black liberation theology, is a much-admired figure at Trinity. Cone told me that when he’s asked where his theology is institutionally embodied, he always mentions Trinity. Cone’s groundbreaking 1969 book Black Theology and Black Power announced: “The time has come for white America to be silent and listen to black people…. All white men are responsible for white oppression…. Theologically, Malcolm X was not far wrong when he called the white man ‘the devil.’ … Any advice from whites to blacks on how to deal with white oppression is automatically under suspicion as a clever device to further enslavement.” Contending that the structures of a still-racist society need to be dismantled, Cone is impatient with claims that the race situation in America has improved. In a 2004 essay he wrote, “Black suffering is getting worse, not better…. White supremacy is so clever and evasive that we can hardly name it. It claims not to exist, even though black people are dying daily from its poison” (in Living Stones in the Household of God).

Wright agrees. When I asked him whether white Americans are right to maintain that the racial situation has improved since the days when Africentric Christianity was born, Wright pointed to the racist remarks by radio host Don Imus: “And you say things have improved?”

Michelle Malkin has some good commentary on it as well, on how cracks are beginning to appear in this false messiah Obama.

Last update:
Garrison posted my original comment on her blog and called it “funny” and “tragic.” It’s tragic to stand up for innocent human beings?

It’s tragic how blind she is. She approves hateful, vile and mean-spirited comments that advocate violence against conservatives (torture Cheney and have Bush mauled by a bear), call Jesus a “superfraud” and promote the sexual exploitation industry. And she called MY comment vile. Hahaha! That’s hilarious, if it weren’t so tragic. What a mean-spirited person, I don’t think I’ve ever met anyone so blind and against dialogue. She just wanted pro-abortion monologue and can’t handle debating.

As stated in an earlier post, I recently got a request from Becky Garrison’s myspace to be added as a friend. I accepted the friend invite Garrison even though she’s ultra-left wing and bashes conservatives in her book, Red and Blue God. I posted a comment that pointed out that it’s leftists who have the plank in their eye since they advocate child murder via abortion and infanticide, and it is the conservatives who have only the speck since at least they don’t advocate murder. I also pointed out that McLaren’s teachings are often in line with Gnostic teachings, which is a heresy.

She didn’t approve the comment because she said it was “mean-spirited and vile” even though she approved anti-Semitic, anti-Christian comments, sex shop ads as comments, and she also approved a comment that included a link to a movie that compared blacks to monkeys.
She also blocked our common sense journal myspace profile since we posted a comment she disagreed with or challenged her leftist dogma. So I e-mailed her from another account:

Garrison;

I recently posted a comment calling you to task and trying to start a dialogue from my common sense journal profile. But instead of approving the comment, you blocked me. Why? You sent a friends request and I approved it and sent a comment, and I thought you would send a comment but you blocked me, I guess because you can’t handle dialoguing with people you disagree with?

If you are not lying when you said you add people to start a dialogue, how is it a dialogue when you just block people who disagree with you? You’re not tolerant if you only approve comments you agree with.

Perhaps you don’t add people to dialogue, but rather to hawk your book? Do you not believe in an open and robust debate?

Also I would just like to know, are you against abortion and homosexuality and prostitution? Not meaning we treat homosexuals badly, but I am asking if you are against it. I really would like to know because you sound VERY left wing.

She wrote back:

Your comment did not invite dialogue but was very mean spirited and vile – I get enough of that already on the God’s Politics blog. I have had many “intelligent” conversations via MySpace and Facebook. I’m a registered indepdendent. And Brian McLaren is no heretic – judging is God’s job.

BG

Interesting. So I wrote this back, and blocked the profile I was writing from:

Why did you block surfers of faith and common sense journal? Why not have an intelligent discussion, instead of blocking people who point out holes in your argument? How do you call yourself a follower of Christ when you block other followers of Christ when they don’t toe the political line you follow?

Actually your book is offensive, and your profile is vile (it contains anti-semitic, anti-christian comments and porn ads). But it’s called freedom of speech, and I still read stuff I disagree with. What was offensive about my comment? Because it said abortion is murder? Because it said that it’s the leftists who have the plank and the conservatives who have the speck? Many left wing organizations have opposed the Born Alive Infants Protection Act, which meant to save BORN babies from “botched” abortions. What is offensive about pointing that out?

As for being vile and offensive, you have comments on your profile that promote drug use, sex shops, and a video that compares blacks to monkeys. You have an anti-Semitic comment and anti-Christian comments. And you call my comment that is Christian and conservative “vile”? Who are you to judge?

My comment wasn’t “vile” it just offended you because you disagree with it. Don’t try to judge me, that’s ridiculous.

Don’t assume I am not intelligent because I disagree with you. I am very intelligent, probably more intelligent than you, what was your Graduate Record Examination score? I could have a very intelligent conversation with people who are open minded to the possibility that they are wrong. But you are too blind to see that.

As for McLaren, a lot of his writings are in line with Gnostic thinking, which is a heresy. How is that judging?

Besides, you’re the one attempting to judge me because I disagree with you. Judging is God’s job, not yours.

So I take it you don’t object to homosexuality, abortion, and prostitution? You didn’t answer my question. I would love to debate you but you don’t play fair by blocking people when you disagree with them. I don’t care if you block people you disagree with until you’re alone talking to yourself, but it’s not consistent with a free and robust debate.

Why add people if you block people that post comments pointing out where you are wrong? You approve porn, anti-black, anti-semitic, and anti-Christian comments that are really vile, and my comment was not vile but it just offended your dogma. The fact that you blocked us is vile, but I don’t care. No follower of Christ would shun a person for disagreeing with them. If you want to start a dialogue then e-mail me at www.myspace.com/commonsensejournal but I already know you won’t because you are too dogmatic to consider opposing points of view. My comments were nowhere near “vile” and it’s disgusting and evil to even say that they were.

Garrison is not an independent or moderate, she is an extremist leftist who blocks people who challenge her pro-abortion, leftist, I-will-block-you-if-you-are-conservative dogma.

• “Good enough for the Nazis, good enough for the Minutemen” –quote by insanely stupid and racist Ruben Navarrette.

Can someone please cue the sound “duh duh duuuuh” from the show “Mind of Mencia”?

What do you do when you when you can’t argue against someone’s point rationally?  You compare then to Nazis. When all else fails, the feeble-minded screech “Nazi!” even when there are no genocide supporters, no anti-Semites, no delusional racists who want to invade Poland.

That’s exactly what Ruben Navarrette Jr., “member of the editorial board of the San Diego Union-Tribune and a nationally syndicated columnist” did, in a recent column on CNN.com titled, “Minutemen have a right to be idiotic.” Hmm, let’s see, there’s so many fallacies in this poor excuse of an editorial.

First the Nazi comparison. It’s inappropriate for him to compare the Minutemen to Nazis, obviously. Anyone with an IQ higher than 40 should see that. He mentions that according to the Southern Poverty Law Center that there are a few people in the Minutemen that are members of hate groups. But according to the Minutemen’s official policies and web site, they do not accept racists. They have members from many ethnicities, and recently were featured alongside a group of black activists. The inappropriate Nazi analogy is disgusting and sick.

He compares the Minuteman’s founder speech being curtailed by left wing activists (against freedom of political speech) at Columbia University recently as being similiar to a situation a few decades ago where Jews protested a Nazi march. That is a wholly inaccurate and offensive analogy. Navarrette states, “Good enough for the Nazis, good enough for the Minutemen.” But these left wing loonies were arguing against a mainstream, common sense point for supporting a law, not Nazis.

And excuse me, Ruben. Some of my ancestors were German Jews. The Minutemen are not Nazis. Calling them that lowers the debate and takes any credibility your silly little simpleton mind had to begin with. The Minutemen are trying to uphold a common sense law to prevent the invasion of people from another country illegally, many of whom cost us millions of dollars a year in costs, raise the crime rate, overcrowd our streets and cause even more environmental destruction and urban sprawl and generally lower the quality of life.

Ironically, the only racists here are many of the pro-illegal immigration supporters. They want people to be able to skip ahead of the line simply because of their ethnicity and race. One of the pro-illegal groups are called, “La Raza,” meaning, “the race.” They have hate signs proclaiming people “stole their land” even though they came from Spain. Some hispanics want other hispanics to be able to skip ahead of people of other ethnicities–say, India for example, many of whom are doctors and engineers. To let people skip ahead because of race is racism, and it’s also supporting by definition a criminal act. A person who would defy the law like this I do not want in my country. I have many Hispanic friends, all here legally: Cuban, Mexican, whatever. But illegal immigration is a huge problem and you don’t fix it by just making it worse (letting everyone in).

Speaking of Nazis, the only marches that could be compared to Nazi marches are the pro-illegal rallies a few months ago. Here’s a few quotes, but you can see more here where I quote quite a few of the anti-Semitic, racist remarks by the slow-minded, racist and insane La Raza. They are all taken from an editorial from La Raza, which sounds an awful lot like a pre-WWII hysterical Hitler machinating about Jews and their money:

“School board Jews like Julie Korenstein, Marlene Canter, David Tokofsky, Jon Lauritzen and Mike Lansing are just enriching themselves and their cronies through crooked deals involving school construction projects, and contracts with so called consultants and vendors.”

“La Raza’s battle for the 20th Senate District is a perfect example of how the Jews will fight tooth and nail to maintain their dominance in state government.”

“The Jews of California, about 3% of the state’s population, have an overwhelming and disproportionate share of the state’s wealth which they utilize effectively to wield immense influence on the state’s political apparatus principally through dominance of the Democratic Party. Both U.S Senators of the state are ladies of Jewish descent and there is no sector of California society, either private or public, in which Jews are not significant policy makers.”

“The 20th Senate District was one in transition where Mexicanos were barely outnumbering Jews. The race became wide open when Herschel Rosenthall, a Jew, could not run for re-election because of term limits. A very popular Mexicano by the name of Richard Alarcon, then a Los Angeles City Councilman, decided to challenge the Jewish domination of the senate district by declaring himself a candidate against the Jew Richard Katz . He won by a mere 29 votes but the bloody battle between the Jews and La Raza left a bitter aftermath that has had negative repercussions to this day.”

“The Jews are sore losers and they did not take the defeat graciously.”

“The battle for the 20th Senate District in California should provide a very valuable lesson for La Raza. In our political struggle for self-determination, we can not assume the certain groups will be our friends. Jews have catered for our vote in the past but when it comes our turn to share in real political power, they will turn their face and become our enemies.”

“…Jewish run American Civil Liberties Union(ACLU) which is led in southern California by a Jewish lady by the name of Ramona Ripston. Soon, with the guidance and funding of Jews, he became and Assemblyperson and eventually the Speaker of the State Assembly.”

“…He was merely a “puppet” of Jewish interests in the Assembly.”

“A case in point is his relationship with Jews Ron Unz and Bob Hertzberg. Ron Unz is the wealthy Jewish Mogul who funded the successful passage of the anti-Bilingual Initiative that outlawed Spanish/English bilingual education in California’s public schools.”

“Another example of Villargairosa’s Jewish collusion is his selling-out of the Assembly Speakership to Bob Hertzberg. Bob Hertzburg is a Jewish Assemblyman that represents Assembly District 40.”

“Our increasing population and voting strength will, in the near future, collide with the interests of the Jews in Alta California, and for that matter, in the other regions of Aztlan. Our increasing ties with our brothers and sisters in Mexico will also present a challenge for the American Jewish community.” 

La Raza: they invade a country then blame all their problems on the Jews. Sound familiar?

You can write Mr. Nazi at ruben.navarrette@uniontrib.com.

Many of these pro-illegal immigration by the millions people are nuts. But most people are sane, thank goodness. According to an AP report, “Recent polls show that about six in 10 Americans oppose letting illegal immigrants remain in the country and apply for citizenship and three of every four don’t believe the government is doing enough to stem the continuing tide of new arrivals.”

I encourage everyone to go to www.weneedafence.com and send a letter to your representative. We need a state of the art fence to keep terrorists out, and, by common sense, keep track of who enters and leaves the country. That is what passports are for. See a recent Miami Herald editorial about it at
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/opinion/14194449.htm

See http://www.numbersusa.com to see how uncontrolled immigration has led to and will lead to the destruction of America’s natural environment, more urban sprawl, and lower wages.

There are a lot of articles with a slant different from the pro-illegal bias of most broadcast news, check a few out, like Human Event’s “Illegal Aliens: Just Mobbing the Streets American Won’t Mob”

The protests prove . . . how ridiculously out of control our federal government has let the problem get. Which is worse — that a half million immigration criminals and their descendants and sympathizers can be found in a single American city, or that the current immigration enforcement system is such a joke that the half million have nothing to fear from openly entering the public streets and arguing against legislation currently before Congress?

It’s as if thieves thought they could form a union to lobby for fewer cops.

and Tony Blankley’s “Mexican illegals vs. American voters”.

Also, Michelle Malkin keeps up on the immigrant news at www.michellemalkin.com and has some informative links such as here, here, here, here and here. Many people call for part of the United States to be “given back” to Mexico. See http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=9600; http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=1880; http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=9628

If the United States is a “nation of immigrants,” then so is every country, since everyone’s ancestors came from somewhere else at one point, including Europe, Asia, and South America. What is the difference if our ancestors came here 200 or 300 years ago as opposed to 400 years ago, or 1,500 years ago? We, Native-born Americans, were born here. Illegal immigrants who have criminally come here are not native to America, contrary to what these sheeple may think.

I have Canadian heritage, does that mean I can move to Canada and tell the people born there to move? I have English, Welsh and German Swiss heritage, does that mean I can sneak into Europe and tell the native-born people there to move? Of course not. And this is assuming that the descendants of the Mexifascists were here first, which they weren’t except a VERY tiny sliver of the United States.

When the European settlers came here, Britain owned the east coast and it was called “New England,” France owned a huge expanse of the Midwest from Louisiana up to Canada and it was called “New France,” and Spain settled in Mexican areas as well as a very tiny sliver of the California coast, and a very small portion of Arizona and New Mexico, around that area. Now are we supposed to give the Midwest back to France, and then France give it back to the Native Americans??

I think my dad’s mother was Native American, and if true, does that mean I can kick the everyone else out? Of course not.? I am also part Jewish, should I move to Israel and tell the people born there to move? Nope. Of course, my examples are different because I would help a country’s economy because I am educated and would not burden it with higher rates of crime and more free handouts like completely free (enter want here) which would be paid by making out nation go into deeper debt.

Of course, most Mexicans are not indigenous anyway: they would have to be interbred with Native Americans, and even if they were, they were not Native Americans from the area where the United States is, but South American countries and Mexico.

We need a fence with no spaces in between except for the check points, to prevent terrorism and the huge cost from illegal immigrants. Letting so many illegal immigrants sneak here lowers wages for many jobs, and they are a huge burden on our healthcare industry which is already hurting from the baby boomer retirements. And the “doing jobs native-born Americans wouldn’t” is kind of a joke, since I myself has scrubbed many toilets at Publix, mowed many yards, unloaded many grocery trucks and Play it Again Sports weight trucks, mopped, scrubbed, waxed floors and sweeped for many years. And what is more difficult, picking strawberries or going into a mineshaft? I hate hearing “That building Mr. Bush you go into, you know, it?was built by Mexicans.” Ummmm yeah, not really. This country was founded upon ingenuity and creative inventions, literature and common sense. Yes, and hard work, but not by just one race. While many Mexican Americans contribute to our economy, they are not the backbone they portray themselves to be, at least not the illegals. According to one estimate, they make up only 5 percent of our work force. The point to keep our borders secure is not racist, it’s common sense.

It’s insane to think we should just leave our borders open to possible terrorists to sneak in with a bomb just to apease the angry mobs who also sneak in that way, aided by Mexican army with automatic weapons, who are indeed not in the majority. We need a reinforced wall, with cameras every couple of miles. As one writer stated, if we cannot secure our own border, maintain our own healthcare, secure our own identity of who is here legally and who is not, then we are no longer a nation. America has gotten lazy and comfy. It’s time got us Native-born United States Americans, whether we be of European, Jewish, Canadian, Cuban, Arab, Asian or other descent, to wake up and stand up for our rights to a secure border. Let’s get our head out of the sand.

Yes, the 9-11 hijackers didn’t cross the Mexican border. This is true. But one reason 9-11 happened is because we did not expect it. In order to prevent terrorism, to use a cliche here, we should think outside of the box. It’s obvious the terrorists know we now have better reinforced cockpit walls, better airport security (I hope), and so on. In order to prevent another terrorist attack, it’s important to think of all the possible ways they could get here, which includes not just by air but water and land as well.

Anyway, there are many legal immigrants that work here.

I dated a girl that was part Mexican/Hawaiian/Welsh when I went to Evangel and my best friend when I went to Southeastern is a missionary’s kid, from Mexico City. So I am not against the melting pot, I just think legal migration is the way to go, with a set number each year. We let more people in than any other nation, but that doesn’t mean all 6 billion people in the world should be able to just automatically become a citizen of the U.S. if they sneak in. There is the question of assimiliation, would they be able to fit into our culture as well as keep their heritage, as well as the question of patriotism. If Mexico and the U.S. were in a dispute, I doubt many of the pro-illegal immigration protestors would be on the U.S. side. We are a nation of many different backgrounds, but we are still a nation.

These are photos of protests for illegal immigrants, not people that came here legally. Some of them have taken down the American flag at their school and replaced it with the Mexican flag. Others show their racist side, saying that just because they are from Mexico they are the only ones to be on this entire continent, which is Mexico, the United States and Canada.? It’s the Mexifascists!? How ironic.

Beware: extreme stupidity ahead.

Please spell correctly when making idiotic signs.

a modified flag

what’s an irrational rally without the Black Panthers?

Che: Murderer of many, hero to the sheeple.

Someone needs a history lesson.? And an intro to logic.

I know you are but what am I!?

Now, what would protestors do if they can’t defend their irrational, pro-illegal extremist position with logic?? Well, use the fallacious,?inappropriate and?offensive?Nazi analogy!

Should?this representative, who came up with a common sense proposal to secure our borders, be compared to a Nazi?? Only if he were calling for the extermination of millions of Jews, the disabled, and others.?But he’s not.?But the pro-illegals don’t let the facts get in the way of their hysteria.?Anyway, let’s see about the racism and anti-Semitism from the pro-illegal immigration activists:

An article by Ernesto Cienfuegos in La Voz de Aztlan titled, “Aztlan Arising: 700,000+ March in Los Angeles: La Gran Marcha” surpasses all expectations” detailed the turnout. Notice the authors pretends the byline is from “Alta California,” not California the state. Also notice the sentences I highlighted bold.

Los Angeles, Alta California – March 26, 2006 – (ACN) Yesterday’s march and rally for immigrant rights in downtown Los Angeles is the largest in the city’s history. Never has the “City of Angels” seen so many demonstrators filling the streets of the city’s center. The sleeping giant has finally awaken giving rise to a new immigrant civil rights movement of unprecedented proportions.

……

What does the immense success of “La Gran Marcha” mean to Mexicanos and other Latinos? It simply means that we now have the numbers, the political will and the organizational skills to direct our own destinies and not be subservient to the White and Jewish power structures. It means that we can now undertake bigger and more significant mass actions to achieve total political and economic liberation like that being proposed by Juan José ‡utié²²ez, President of Movimiento Latino USA. Juan José ‡utié²²ez is proposing that the coalition that organized “La Gran Marcha” meet in Arizona or Texas on April 8 to “organize a mass boycott (huelga) against the economy of the USA” to take place on May 5 or 19.

A major reason for the great success of “La Gran Marcha” was the strong participation of labor unions and the Catholic Church. This same alliance contributed to the success of Lech Walesa’s “Solidarity Movement” in the Republic of Poland. This can be done in Aztlan as well. If the racist “Sensenbrenner Legislation” passes the US Senate, there is no doubt that a massive civil disobedience movement will emerge. Eventually labor union power can merge with the immigrant civil rights and “Immigrant Sanctuary” movements to enable us to either form a new political party or to do heavy duty reforming of the existing Democratic Party. The next and final steps would follow and that is to elect our own governors of all the states within Aztlan.

The great success of “La Gran Marcha” also means that the time has come to organize and politicize our great number of youths that are just festering in many of our school districts. The walkouts in Los Angeles of thousands of Mexican and Latino students from Huntington Park, South Gate, Southeast, Jordan, Montebello, Garfield and Roosevelt High Schools on Friday, one day before “La Gran Marcha”, only shows that they are now ready to be mobilized and advised on how they can improve their educations. Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villagairosa, a Los Angeles Unified School District victim himself before he turned his life around, is already undertaking a bold moved to wrestle control of the district from a Jewish dominated school board and a White superintendent that are just fleecing the schools of much needed funds. School board Jews like Julie Korenstein, Marlene Canter, David Tokofsky, Jon Lauritzen and Mike Lansing are just enriching themselves and their cronies through crooked deals involving school construction projects, and contracts with so called consultants and vendors. The LAUSD is the second largest in the nation, next to New York, with a multi-billion dollar annual budget. It has an overwhelming Mexican and Latino student population. Jews have their own private schools so why are 5 Jews out of 7 school board members interested in governing the school district? The answer is all too obvious. La Voz de Aztlan has interviewed LAUSD teachers that complained that they have to buy, with their own money, pencils, paper and other school supplies that the district should provide. Something has to done and Mayor Villaraigosa is on the right track

……

“Aqui estamos y no nos vamos y si nos devuelven. . . regresamos!”

Right.

Anyway, here’s another example of how the Mexiracists try to categorize everyone into a race instead of judging people on their character. A “LA VOZ DE AZTLAN EDITORIAL” which can be read at http://www.aztlan.net/razajews.htm?titled La Raza and Jews on Collision Course in Alta California, details a conspiracy theory on par with pre-WWII Hitler’s mania.? I’ll let this racist vitriole speak for itself:

There are now significant signs of an impending collision between La Raza and Jews in California. The signs were first manifested during the state’s 1998 election primary when a Mexicano defeated the Jewish candidate Richard Katz in the state’s 20th Senate District and when the wealthy Jew, Ron Unz, was successful in having an anti-bilingual education initiative approved by the state’s electorate. The battle lines between Mexicanos and Jews in California have been drawn and they have been drawn most clearly in the City of Los Angeles.

La Raza’s battle for the 20th Senate District is a perfect example of how the Jews will fight tooth and nail to maintain their dominance in state government. The victorious battle by La Raza in the 20th S.D., which is located in the middle of the San Fernando Valley in Los Angeles, was only a small skirmish of a larger battle that is about to occur as we seek more equitable proportional representation in state and local governments.

The Jews of California, about 3% of the state’s population, have an overwhelming and disproportionate share of the state’s wealth which they utilize effectively to wield immense influence on the state’s political apparatus principally through dominance of the Democratic Party. Both U.S Senators of the state are ladies of Jewish descent and there is no sector of California society, either private or public, in which Jews are not significant policy makers. The sectors that they can not control directly, they will do it indirectly through the purchase of influence as well as the cunning manipulation of ethnic and other minorities.

La Raza’s victory in the 20th Senate District has been a turning point in the relationship between Mexicanos and Jews. It is the very first time that a significant clash for political control, at the state level, has taken place between the two ethnic groups.

Political representation in Los Angeles County is presently determined along racial and ethnic lines. For example, the Congressional Delegation of the county is presently divided between Mexicanos, Afro-Americans, Jews and Whites. There are four Congresspersons of Mexican descent (Becerra, Solis, Roybal, Napolitano) , three of African descent, two of Jewish descent (Waxman, Berman) and the rest are Whites. They each represent districts where the majority of the population are of the same racial or ethnic group as they are. The same is true with state assembly and state senate districts.

The 20th Senate District was one in transition where Mexicanos were barely outnumbering Jews. The race became wide open when Herschel Rosenthall, a Jew, could not run for re-election because of term limits. A very popular Mexicano by the name of Richard Alarcon, then a Los Angeles City Councilman, decided to challenge the Jewish domination of the senate district by declaring himself a candidate against the Jew Richard Katz . He won by a mere 29 votes but the bloody battle between the Jews and La Raza left a bitter aftermath that has had negative repercussions to this day.

The Jews are sore losers and they did not take the defeat graciously. They insinuated that Mexicans were racists and anti-semitic simply because we challenged them and beat them politically. They criticized Senator Richard Alarcon because during his campaign he publicized a very nice picture of himself and Catholic Cardinal Roger Mahoney. Never mind that various Jewish publications in Los Angeles, supporting Katz’ campaign, had photographs of him wearing Jewish kippahs while praying at Jewish synagogues.

The battle for the 20th Senate District in California should provide a very valuable lesson for La Raza. In our political struggle for self-determination, we can not assume the certain groups will be our friends. Jews have catered for our vote in the past but when it comes our turn to share in real political power, they will turn their face and become our enemies.

Since they comprise a very small percent of the overall population, they are forced to utilize strategies outside of having the most numbers to maintain control. A principal strategy is to utilize their vast supply of funds to manipulate the political system as they are presently doing in the race for mayor of Los Angeles. They are very adept at manipulating the varied political interests as well as the interests of racial, ethnic and sexual preference minorities.

They have formed alliances with the Black community, for example, in order to put the rightful political emergence of La Raza in check as they did when a Jew/Black coalition elected Tom Bradley, the first Black mayor of Los Angeles. Later, they formed an alliance with Republicans to elect Richard Riordan as the mayor. Jews are very good at formimg alliances with anyone as long it serves their interests . They play all sides of a fence, this way they guarantee that they will always be on the winning side. What they are doing now in the present race for mayor of Los Angeles speaks volumes as to the varied and effective strategies they utilize to perpetuate their political and economic power.

Sensing that Chicanos and Mexicanos have now become an increasing challenge that can no longer be checked with their traditional methods, they have now resorted to investing in the development and empowerment of a small cadre of “vendido hispanic politicos” that they can easily manipulate to carry out their policies. One of these “politicos” is Antonio “Tony” Villargairosa who is running for mayor of Los Angeles. Tony Villargairosa was recruited from East Los Angeles and appointed a Vice-President of the Jewish run American Civil Liberties Union(ACLU) which is led in southern California by a Jewish lady by the name of Ramona Ripston. Soon, with the guidance and funding of Jews, he became and Assemblyperson and eventually the Speaker of the State Assembly.

As Speaker of the Assembly, Villargairosa did nothing for La Raza. He is presently running under the “Education Banner” , but he did nothing to open up higher education for the many deserving Chicano/Mexicano students who are now left without a future. He was a member of UC Board of Regents yet he never took a leadership role in changing their racist and ethnocentric policies. He was merely a “puppet” of Jewish interests in the Assembly.

A case in point is his relationship with Jews Ron Unz and Bob Hertzberg. Ron Unz is the wealthy Jewish Mogul who funded the successful passage of the anti-Bilingual Initiative that outlawed Spanish/English bilingual education in California’s public schools. This has been a devastating defeat for La Raza yet Antonio “Tony” Villargairosa awarded Ron Unz with an appointment to an Assembly Blue Ribbon Commission. Later, Ron Unz departed to Arizona where he was instrumental in passing a similar anti-Spanish language initiative there. La Raza considers Villagairosa’s actions concerning Ron Unz pure treason. We can not trust him as mayor of Los Angeles because we know that he will not represent our interests. One of his Campaign Finance Officers is Eli Broad who, according to Fortune Magazine, is the richest man in Los Angeles county in addition to being Jewish.

Another example of Villargairosa’s Jewish collusion is his selling-out of the Assembly Speakership to Bob Hertzberg. Bob Hertzburg is a Jewish Assemblyman that represents Assembly District 40. Assembly District 40 is one half of Senate District 20 that was won by Richard Alarcon during the bitter fight between La Raza and Jews in the district. The other half of Senate District 20 is Assembly District 39 which is predominantly Mexicano, and is represented by Tony Cardenas. Because of term limits, Villargairosa had to move on and instead of making sure that a Chicano/Mexicano would replace him as Speaker, he made a deal with the Jews and helped Bob Hetzberg become Speaker. This is a second act of treason for Villargairosa, and more proof that he is simply a lackey for Jewish interests.

Our increasing population and voting strength will, in the near future, collide with the interests of the Jews in Alta California, and for that matter, in the other regions of Aztlan. Our increasing ties with our brothers and sisters in Mexico will also present a challenge for the American Jewish community. The Mexican Dual Nationality Program means that we now have the same status with Mexico that American Jews have with Israel. We are now in the position to question the over eight billion dollars of our tax money that are sent to Israel each year, much of it which is used for military weaponry to strike out against the Palestinians, and soon we will be in the position to remind the American Jews of their shoddy treatment of Mexico when the nation’s UN Ambassador voted to equate Zionism with Racism.

La Raza has been intimidated, over the years, from bringing the above issues into discussion. La Voz de Aztlan has been the victim of censorship on the Internet because we have dared to dialogue on these matters.

Hate e-mail we have received from Jews has demonstrated to us that they can be as bigoted as some white supremacists and their treatment of the Palestinians in Israel shows us that they can be as racist.

Um… I don’t really like Barbara?Boxer or Dianne Feinstein’s politics most of the time, but what does their ethnic heritage have to do with ANYTHING? Only to racists it should matter.? What racist vitriole.

The extremist, racist?and illogical Mexica movement.

Honkies?? Hmm… isn’t that a little racist?

Nope, sorry, we were born here.? So were our parents, and their parents, and their parents…

Michelle Marquez (left), a student at Lamar Middle School in Irving, was criticized for having a U.S. flag during an immigration protest at Kiest Park in Dallas. “My heart is with the Mexican flag and Mexico but I’m standing on American ground and I’m Mexican-American,” she said. Irwin Thompson / DMB Photo Dallas News Staff

I think this woman thinks she is in Mexico.

“How long do we have to hold this pose, my mouth is getting sore!”

Oooo Caaanada is in trouble too?? Do these racists not realize they are from Spain, which is in Europe just like England, Germany, Italy and France?

This sign reads, “Open the door or I’ll break the window.”

A scary prospect.

Oh my gosh!? What is this?? Sanity and common sense from… Berkeley!? Wow this is a first.? These brave students stood up for protecting our borders.

But these pro-illegals covered their political sign with a Mexican flag.? So much for being the proponents of protecting political speech.

See some of the insanity at

The Mexica Bowel Movement web site or the anti-Semitic, anti-American La Raza web site.