Some of the photos on zombietime.com are quite frightening, but the captions he puts on there are quite hilarious.  From the sickening pro-aborts at the Walk for Life rally, to the recent anti-Semite “anti-war” protestors who are not really against violence and intolerance since they are violent and intolerant as well.  From this post, my favorite quotes:  “Which pleople?” and “When a mask for the rally you select, into account its effect on people you must take.”  See link to understand.

Newsbusters reports on how the cable show about lesbians features a sculpture titled, “The unauthorized abortion of W,” which features a photo of the president in the womb. That is sick and evil.  The culture of death loves to offend normal sensibilities of right and wrong.

Two more stories that should make you want to throw up if you have any sort of moral compass:  A Horrific Story about Late Term Abortion about a story about notorious abortionist George Tiller that first aired on the O’Reilly Factor, and Abortion, Infanticide of Ukraine Babies Fuels Stem Cell Research Industry.  Sick.

Drudge links to a story about the feminazi magazine “Ms.” including a petition signed by women who have killed the life inside of them. One 27-year-old woman named Tyffine Jones, 27, of Jackson, Miss., said she “wanted to do something bigger with myself. I didn’t want to be stopped by anything.”

Another pro-abort who signed, Debbie Findling of San Francisco, “described her difficult decision last year to have an abortion after tests showed that she would bear a son with Down syndrome.”

Wow. It’s so difficult to make a decision to kill a human being–scientifically, a living human being–because she or he has a disability? Sick.

She went on to say, “I felt it was my right to make the decision, but having that right doesn’t make the decision any easier,” she said. “It was the hardest decision I’ve ever made.”

“Findling, 42, is married, with a 5-year-old daughter, and has been trying to get pregnant again while pursuing her career as a philanthropic foundation executive.”

How sweet.

Another proponent of the Culture of Death uses faulty logic to promote killing patients:

Doctors should be able to end lives swiftly and humanely, a leading professor said.

Len Doyal, emeritus professor of medical ethics at Queen Mary, University of London, has called for the legalisation of voluntary and non-voluntary euthanasia in the UK.

He believes that the medical profession should realise it is already killing patients when feeding tubes are removed from the terminally ill. Some would suffer a “slow and distressing death” as a result.

Writing in The Royal Society of Medicine’s Clinical Ethics journal, Professor Doyal said: “Doctor-assisted deaths are taking place on a regular and recurring basis in the UK. They should be better regulated.

“When doctors withdraw life-sustaining treatment such as feeding tubes from severely incompetent patients, it should morally be recognised for what it is - euthanasia, where death is foreseen with certainty.

Hitler would be very proud. Withdrawing feeding tubes actually is euthanasia, so he is correct there. But actively killing an innocent human being is very different from withdrawing life support such as a ventilator, since you are letting an incurable, unconcious person who cannot breathe on their own die in one case–letting nature take its course–compared to killing a human being before they naturally die.

The early 1900’s Germans talked about “Life Unworthy of Life.” They wanted a “law for the annihilation of valueless lives” (Gesetz zur Vernichtung lebensunwen Lebens). The Holocaust began by killing the very young and disabled, then later all of the disabled. Parents of disabled children could write the government to kill their child. This led to compulsory killing. And of course the virulent anti-Semitism that had existed for centuries combined with Hitler’s maniacal hate towards Jews caused the murders of millions of Jews. The Holocaust is definitely a different phenomena that the current slide towards euthanasia and the culture of death. But they are both evil. We must fight against anyone who calls for the killing of the disabled as some “right.” Hitler called the disabled “useless eaters.”

A living, breathing human being was killed because she was disabled: her name was Terri Schiavo. What was the criteria to kill her? She did not need artifical respirator or anything else but to be fed. This woman who had gotten this way from anorexia eventually was starved to death by the leftist, activist courts and her husband Michael Schiavo. Not surprisingly, this Neo-Nazi now has a blog at DailyKos, the leftist (and therefore pro-abortion on demand, pro-partial birth abortion, and pro-killing of the disabled) blog.

Others blogging: Michelle Malkin, Iowa Voice, The Zero Point, Kesher Talk

From ProLifeBlogs, another example of pro-abortion intolerance towards the standing up for innocent human beings:

Rose Mawhorter was viciously assaulted while protesting abortion across the street from Vancouver’s most notorious abortion clinic. Although the story was covered by LifeSiteNews a few days after the April 7 incident, Rose has just released a video of the attack (warning - explicit language).

Just another example of liberal tolerance, right?

Selena Ewing, research officer at the Southern Cross Bioethics Institute and a member of Women’s Forum in Australia points out in a recent article in?the Australian paper The Age titled The insiduous censorship of pro-life women how pro-life women are on the move:

When it comes to abortion, women are on the move. They are writing, talking, agitating for change. Women who have had abortions, women who are mothers and women who are not, working women, academics, students - many different kinds of women think society can and should offer more than abortion.

They are pro-life women, challenging the status quo. And they’re not having aloof discussions about other women. It’s about us women.

Yet pro-abortion commentators continue to push the lie that only men want an abortion debate, and that women uniformly support abortion. Why? Why do they want pro-life women to be invisible?

Perhaps they can’t believe that women might question abortion. Perhaps they think these women are simply puppets. Perhaps it’s ignorance.

But most likely, it’s because the lie suits the pro-abortion agenda. The strategy is a form of emotional blackmail. It suggests that to stand in solidarity with other women, we must support abortion as a private decision, as a woman’s choice. To help women, we must abandon them to their desperate “free choices”. To fit women into society, we must surgically restructure their bodies.

….

A divisive and harmful strategy of traditional feminism has been to pit women against men as though enemies. The same old tactic is being played out now. The effect is to stifle the alternative woman’s voice.

So here’s the truth. Most women don’t hate men, and most women don’t like abortion. Some women may feel compelled to support abortion because it appears that women need it. If things were different, women would rather not have it at all. Idealistic? Perhaps.

But that’s why we need to have a public discussion about more than just having abortions. We need to discuss what drives women to abortion, then we need to find solutions.

There is a new generation, young women who have watched many friends and sisters endure the torment of abortion. They are aware of the pressures of motherhood and the demands of the corporate world. They know abortion is a quick, cheap response to a desperate woman - but that its effects can be devastating.

These women want a debate and they want change. They don’t want abortion - they want a world that accepts them and their bodies. They are part of a grassroots movement that has coalesced into Women’s Forum Australia - an independent women’s think tank that undertakes research, education and advocacy in a wide range of social, cultural, economic and health issues affecting women, including abortion. The membership is growing daily.

Awesome, common sense commentary. Thanks Ms. Ewing.

Related: Culture Jam for Life’s Freedom of Speech special report