From the New York Times, “Bipartisan Effort to Draft Immigration Bill“:

WASHINGTON, Dec. 25 — Counting on the support of the new Democratic majority in Congress, Democratic lawmakers and their Republican allies are working on measures that could place millions of illegal immigrants on a more direct path to citizenship than would a bill that the Senate passed in the spring.

The lawmakers are considering abandoning a requirement in the Senate bill that would compel several million illegal immigrants to leave the United States before becoming eligible to apply for citizenship.

The Democrats are rewarding criminals that break laws and the racist lobbyists who advocate letting people skip ahead of the line because of their race. Why should a Mexican be able to skip ahead of the line of someone from say, China, India or Europe, solely because of their race? We need to secure our borders. Call or write your representative today.

Jose Angel Gutierrez, professor at University of Texas, Arlington and founder of La Raza Unida political party stated: “We have an aging white America. . . . They are dying. . . . They are ******** in their pants with fear! I love it!” “We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him.

And since 1970, he has professed, “Our devil has pale skin and blue eyes.”

See
http://www.americanpatrol.com/REFERENCE/JoseAngelGutierrezQuote.html

What an evil turd. Here’s a video of him talking as well as other racist latino devils. I feel sorry for other hispanics, who are normal and not racist and are here illegally, to be even the same race as this evil piece of mung.

Armando Navarro, Professor of UC Riverside calls for “Artillery” to attack Americans… why isn’t this racist turd in jail, either?

Racist Joe Baca, CA State Senator, states that he is happy there are so many latinos out in the crowd. He then says, “We’re in a civil war.”

Michelle Malkin has pointed out how leftists stormed the stage and prevented the Minutemen Founder and others from speaking at Columbia University. Now World Net Daily reports how the leftists and pro-illegals actually called the Black Minuteman speaker the “n” word. Not surprising, actually.

During the attempted speech, Minutemen member Marvin Stewart was harassed and called the “n” word by the pro-illegals. Just more violent, liberal, anti-political speech threats.

Socialists and pro-illegals hate freedom of political speech. Here they storm the stage against a mainstream, American specker, calling the black speaker the “n” word. WND Photo.

Michelle Malkin recently points to a blog by Patterico pointing out how L.A. Times columnist actually condoned the violence against freedom of political speech, speech which most mainstream American support. The columnist, Meghan Dahm, wrote:

THE EVENTS at Columbia University on Oct. 4, in which about a dozen students stormed a stage where the founder of an anti-illegal immigration group was speaking, didn’t exactly resemble those of April 1968. There were no arrests, no soundtrack by the Grateful Dead, no occupation of the president’s office. But considering that most young people are considered to be politically apathetic, you have to credit the Chicano Caucus and the International Socialist Organization for trying.

Patterico points out how Daum is fully aware of the violence of the thugs:

Protesters later said Gilchrist was knocked backward and his glasses were broken. The student newspaper, the Columbia Spectator, reported that “one student was kicked in the head and bleeding.”

And she still gives them a “good grade” for trying:

Still, I’ll give them an A (OK, maybe a B+) for trying.

Patterico then points how she tries to defend her stance by calling a former terrorist Mark Rudd, the founder of the Students for a Democractic Society. He later was a member of the radical Weather Underground and went into hiding from 1970 to 1977 after being involved with making bombs to attack the United States.

So Daum defends attacking freedom of political speech by using violence then defends her stance by talking to a former terrorist who planned attacks against United States citizens. The illegals and their supporters are not for American values like freedom of political speech.

What an idiot. You can write Meghan Dahm at mdaum@latimescolumnists.com.

• “Good enough for the Nazis, good enough for the Minutemen” –quote by insanely stupid and racist Ruben Navarrette.

Can someone please cue the sound “duh duh duuuuh” from the show “Mind of Mencia”?

What do you do when you when you can’t argue against someone’s point rationally?  You compare then to Nazis. When all else fails, the feeble-minded screech “Nazi!” even when there are no genocide supporters, no anti-Semites, no delusional racists who want to invade Poland.

That’s exactly what Ruben Navarrette Jr., “member of the editorial board of the San Diego Union-Tribune and a nationally syndicated columnist” did, in a recent column on CNN.com titled, “Minutemen have a right to be idiotic.” Hmm, let’s see, there’s so many fallacies in this poor excuse of an editorial.

First the Nazi comparison. It’s inappropriate for him to compare the Minutemen to Nazis, obviously. Anyone with an IQ higher than 40 should see that. He mentions that according to the Southern Poverty Law Center that there are a few people in the Minutemen that are members of hate groups. But according to the Minutemen’s official policies and web site, they do not accept racists. They have members from many ethnicities, and recently were featured alongside a group of black activists. The inappropriate Nazi analogy is disgusting and sick.

He compares the Minuteman’s founder speech being curtailed by left wing activists (against freedom of political speech) at Columbia University recently as being similiar to a situation a few decades ago where Jews protested a Nazi march. That is a wholly inaccurate and offensive analogy. Navarrette states, “Good enough for the Nazis, good enough for the Minutemen.” But these left wing loonies were arguing against a mainstream, common sense point for supporting a law, not Nazis.

And excuse me, Ruben. Some of my ancestors were German Jews. The Minutemen are not Nazis. Calling them that lowers the debate and takes any credibility your silly little simpleton mind had to begin with. The Minutemen are trying to uphold a common sense law to prevent the invasion of people from another country illegally, many of whom cost us millions of dollars a year in costs, raise the crime rate, overcrowd our streets and cause even more environmental destruction and urban sprawl and generally lower the quality of life.

Ironically, the only racists here are many of the pro-illegal immigration supporters. They want people to be able to skip ahead of the line simply because of their ethnicity and race. One of the pro-illegal groups are called, “La Raza,” meaning, “the race.” They have hate signs proclaiming people “stole their land” even though they came from Spain. Some hispanics want other hispanics to be able to skip ahead of people of other ethnicities–say, India for example, many of whom are doctors and engineers. To let people skip ahead because of race is racism, and it’s also supporting by definition a criminal act. A person who would defy the law like this I do not want in my country. I have many Hispanic friends, all here legally: Cuban, Mexican, whatever. But illegal immigration is a huge problem and you don’t fix it by just making it worse (letting everyone in).

Speaking of Nazis, the only marches that could be compared to Nazi marches are the pro-illegal rallies a few months ago. Here’s a few quotes, but you can see more here where I quote quite a few of the anti-Semitic, racist remarks by the slow-minded, racist and insane La Raza. They are all taken from an editorial from La Raza, which sounds an awful lot like a pre-WWII hysterical Hitler machinating about Jews and their money:

“School board Jews like Julie Korenstein, Marlene Canter, David Tokofsky, Jon Lauritzen and Mike Lansing are just enriching themselves and their cronies through crooked deals involving school construction projects, and contracts with so called consultants and vendors.”

“La Raza’s battle for the 20th Senate District is a perfect example of how the Jews will fight tooth and nail to maintain their dominance in state government.”

“The Jews of California, about 3% of the state’s population, have an overwhelming and disproportionate share of the state’s wealth which they utilize effectively to wield immense influence on the state’s political apparatus principally through dominance of the Democratic Party. Both U.S Senators of the state are ladies of Jewish descent and there is no sector of California society, either private or public, in which Jews are not significant policy makers.”

“The 20th Senate District was one in transition where Mexicanos were barely outnumbering Jews. The race became wide open when Herschel Rosenthall, a Jew, could not run for re-election because of term limits. A very popular Mexicano by the name of Richard Alarcon, then a Los Angeles City Councilman, decided to challenge the Jewish domination of the senate district by declaring himself a candidate against the Jew Richard Katz . He won by a mere 29 votes but the bloody battle between the Jews and La Raza left a bitter aftermath that has had negative repercussions to this day.”

“The Jews are sore losers and they did not take the defeat graciously.”

“The battle for the 20th Senate District in California should provide a very valuable lesson for La Raza. In our political struggle for self-determination, we can not assume the certain groups will be our friends. Jews have catered for our vote in the past but when it comes our turn to share in real political power, they will turn their face and become our enemies.”

“…Jewish run American Civil Liberties Union(ACLU) which is led in southern California by a Jewish lady by the name of Ramona Ripston. Soon, with the guidance and funding of Jews, he became and Assemblyperson and eventually the Speaker of the State Assembly.”

“…He was merely a “puppet” of Jewish interests in the Assembly.”

“A case in point is his relationship with Jews Ron Unz and Bob Hertzberg. Ron Unz is the wealthy Jewish Mogul who funded the successful passage of the anti-Bilingual Initiative that outlawed Spanish/English bilingual education in California’s public schools.”

“Another example of Villargairosa’s Jewish collusion is his selling-out of the Assembly Speakership to Bob Hertzberg. Bob Hertzburg is a Jewish Assemblyman that represents Assembly District 40.”

“Our increasing population and voting strength will, in the near future, collide with the interests of the Jews in Alta California, and for that matter, in the other regions of Aztlan. Our increasing ties with our brothers and sisters in Mexico will also present a challenge for the American Jewish community.” 

La Raza: they invade a country then blame all their problems on the Jews. Sound familiar?

You can write Mr. Nazi at ruben.navarrette@uniontrib.com.

CNN is running a story titled, “7 ‘undocumented immigrants’ pulled out of storm drain” even though later they correctly refer to the illegal immigrants as illegal immigrants. This reminds me of a study on media bias against the truth by the left wing press.

Bush better not further demoralize his common sense base by deceiving us into thinking he signed the border fence bill, but let it be vetoed by not signing it by Wednesday. According to Michelle Malkin, Bush may do a “pocket veto” by not signing the bill that would build a security fence along part of the Mexican/American border. If he does, forget most of the base voting for anyone he supports this November.

Also, Mexico has the gall to hint that they might take their “dispute” with the common sense wall to the U.N.:

PARIS — Mexico’s foreign secretary said Monday the country may take a dispute over U.S. plans to build a fence on the Mexican border to the United Nations.

Luis Ernesto Derbez told reporters in Paris, his first stop on a European tour, that a legal investigation was under way to determine whether Mexico has a case.

The Mexican government last week sent a diplomatic note to Washington criticizing the plan for 700 miles of new fencing along the border.

It’s bad enough they think they can import criminals and drug runners from Mexico, but this attempt at stomping on our national sovereignty is ludicrous. How dare they even hint at attempting to force us not to build a security fence? Why would that even be a possibility? It’s our country, if we want to build a security fence to keep gang members, criminals, and drug runners out, to preserve our natural environment from urban sprawl, our children from higher crime rates, and our sanity from more crowded roads and highways, then why can’t we? I am sick of it. Remember when Mexican fans chanted “Osama” at the World Cup when they played us? Well forget Mexico, it’s dirty piece of crap country with a corrupt government and a dirty capital city. If the Mexican flag is so great, then move back there instead of being a tax on our economy and our quality of life.

Why should people from Mexico be able to skip to the head of the immigration line, ahead of people from India for example, many of whom are doctors, dentists, and engineers?

The illegal aliens that have committed various crimes in the prison system just in the Tampa area are costing MILLIONS of dollars to the taxpayers. They also don’t pay income tax, the biggest kind of tax for many people. Send them back to their home. Mexico should reimburse us for having to put up with them.

Update:

Hmm Left Wing hate points out that apparently Congress has not even presented the bill to the President yet, so he has more than by Wednesday to sign it. Much ado about nothing? We’ll see.

But California Conservative points out a Washington Post article from October 6:

“No sooner did Congress authorize construction of a 700-mile fence on the U.S.-Mexico border last week than lawmakers rushed to approve separate legislation that ensures it will never be built, at least not as advertised, according to Republican lawmakers and immigration experts.”

Michelle Malkin has an informative post about blatant bias in the media about illegal immigration, pointing to a Media Research study.

■ Advocates of opening a wider path to citizenship were almost twice as likely to speak in news stories as advocates of stricter immigration control. Advocates for amnesty and guest-worker programs drew 504 soundbites in the study period, compared to just 257 for tighter border control. (Sixty-nine soundbites were neutral). On the days of pro-illegal-alien rallies, their critics nearly disappeared from the screen. For instance, on the night of April 10, the soundbite count on the three evening newscasts and ABC’s Nightline was 43 to 2 in favor of the protesters. When the debate shifted to Capitol Hill in May, coverage grew more balanced.
■ While conservative labels were common, liberal labels were rarely or never used. In the study period, reporters referred to “conservatives” or “conservative” groups 89 times, most intensely during legislative debate in May, when President Bush was presented as having to “appease” his “conservative” base. NBC’s Matt Lauer even referred to Bush’s base as the “far right.” By contrast, the “liberal” label was used only three times – all of them by ABC. CBS and NBC never used the word, even as hard-left protest organizers described the House bill on public radio as full of “horrendous and macabre clauses, fascist clauses.”

■ While protests centered on underlining the vital role illegal aliens play in the American economy, the burdens of illegal immigration in added government costs or crime were barely covered. While the networks poured out their air time to the sympathetic stories of hard-working immigrant families, only six out of 320 stories mentioned studies that illegal aliens cost more to governments than they provide in tax dollars. Only six stories gave a mention to the problem of the cost or threat of criminal aliens.

■ The networks have not dropped the word “illegal” in favor of “undocumented” immigrants, although some reporters struggled to adopt clumsy liberal-preferred terminology. Groups like the National Association of Hispanic Journalists have urged their colleagues to never use the word “illegal,” but the word was still more than five times more common than “undocumented.” In 320 stories, there were 381 uses of the word “illegal,” and 73 uses of “undocumented.” But some reporters struggled to please: NBC’s Kevin Tibbles actually referred to protests by “those who critics call illegals.”

Malkin also links to reports of pro-illegals taking down an American flag at a California post office and replacing it with the Mexican flag, and stomping on the American flag. 

Two words to those idiots that did this: GO HOME!

Thankfully, they got the American flag back up.  The pro-illegals were there to protest Save Our State protestors, who are rightfully angry at Maywood for saying they will flout Federal law and be a “safe haven” for people who chose to sneak into our country illegally (and try to skip ahead of the line of people from other countries).

Malkin also links to some sickening footage of some pro-illegal Mexican woman calling white people “blue-eyed devils” and saying “you stole our land.”  When will the stupidity of the pro-illegals end?

Freedom Folks and Political Mavens have more accounts.

A pro-illegal immigrant Democratic candidate told a crowd that, and I quote, You don’t need papers for voting.

Francine Busby, a candidate for the 50th Congressional District in the San Diego area “was speaking before a largely Latino crowd in Escondido when she uttered those words. She said yesterday she simply misspoke.” Right. This is just more pandering to people who have broken the law. Anything for votes I guess.

Others blogging: Michelle Malkin, Independent Conservative, California Conservative, Conservative Culture.

What a surprise. Disagree with someone who advocates doing something illegal (invading a country and skipping ahead of line of law-abiding citizens from other countries) then they will do something illegal to try to intimidate you, like shoot at you. From the Drudge Report:

GUNFIRE AT WAFFLE HOUSE AFTER WHITES, HISPANICS ARGUE OVER CITIZENSHIP

A parting gunshot from a vehicle leaving Waffle House in West Asheville, NC shattered a window and caused a minor injury, police said.

The shooting happened around 3:00 a.m. Saturday after a group of whites argued with a group of Hispanics at the 24-hour restaurant on Smokey Park Highway, Asheville police Lt. Wallace Welch said

“The two groups were jawing back and forth with each other over citizenship issues and whatnot,” Welch said.

As the Hispanic group drove off, someone in the vehicle fired at least once into a large window near the front door, he said.

Whether from a ricocheted bullet or flying glass, Welch said, one man?s arm was bleeding when police arrived.

Police were looking for a white Dodge Intrepid that left the restaurant going west.

The Citizen Times has the 911 audio of the calls. Pro-illegals also like to throw rocks when someone disagrees with them as well. Seems like they want to suppress freedom of speech if they disagree with it.

Related: Michelle Malkin blogs on Bush’s recent speech. California Conservative has a good fact sheet about illegal immigrationand so does the Heritage Foundation.

Liberals like to complain that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, but this is what will happen even more with illegal immigration and has done so already. The middle class is against illegal immigration, but the very rich who profit off the slave labor of the illegals and the very poor who want to skip ahead of the legal immigration line want illegal immigration. They are in the minority, and our votes should reflect this. Bush talked about how “they want freedom” in his speech last night. Well are they not free in Mexico? Is El Salvador not a democracy? Is Venezuela… oh wait nevermind.

Bottom line… Wait in line! The middle class is in the majority and should be able to speak their mind without being shot at by these crazies. The middle class should outweigh the super rich and the slave laborers in this debate.

Michelle Malkin links with an article that details how the U.S. Border Patrol notifies the Mexican government of where the Minutemen are located, enabling smugglers and traffickers to illegally cross the border more effectively:

While Minuteman civilian patrols are keeping an eye out for illegal border crossers, the U.S. Border Patrol is keeping an eye out for Minutemen — and telling the Mexican government where they are.

While I am of course against violence against illegal immigrants, can’t this be used to put the Minutemen in harm’s way, especially since many of the Mexican traffickers carry automatic or semi-automatic weapons? We need a reinforced wall to keep criminals out. Call your congressman and senator today.

Other commentary: Stop the ACLU, California Conservative, Conservative Culture