evil pervs

...now browsing by category


Jon Stewart’s Rally for Insanity: Self-Righteousness, Hatred, and Hypocrisy

Sunday, October 31st, 2010
Insane leftists who are for killing of innocent human beings pretending that their opposition is crazy and Hitler-like. Oh, the irony. MSNBC fair use.
Insane, irrational leftists who are for killing of innocent human beings, all the while pretending that their opposition is crazy and Hitler-like. Oh, the irony.

I’ve enjoyed some of Jon Stewart’s comedy over the years, but enough is enough of the hypocrisy, double-think, and irrationality. Stewart often does point out problems in the media and politics, but he is often unfair in his treatment and reserves most of his scorn for those who are conservative. For example, he’s told Sarah Palin “f*ck you” when he disagreed with her painting big-city liberals as unAmerican. Other times he has used rude, crass, and idiotic attempts at humor to demean those with whom he disagrees, whether it’s saying false allegations against Republicans or just being generally mean-spirited.

Which is why it’s so strange that he would term his recent march a “call for rationality” and a “moderate march,” when it was filled with mostly leftists carrying hateful signs and irrational rhetoric.  Politico explained Stewart’s (pretend) motive:

The Rally to Restore Sanity, which merged with Colbert’s March to Keep Fear Alive, had been advertised as nonpolitical. Stewart insisted it was “a clarion call for rationality” and a collective plea for the nation to stop yelling and show more respect to those they disagree with.

I’m all for respecting people with whom you disagree, but it’s almost always the leftists/Marxisists/”progressives”/Democrats who are smearing the opposition instead of addressing their arguments, whether it’s (unbelievably) Democrats/liberals making fun of a poor innocent child who has Down syndrome and whose mother is Sarah Palin, or Democrats attacking conservative women who run for office with sick and sexist “jokes” which aren’t funny. Case in point: Jon Stewart allowed people in with signs that read “I masturbate to [conservative politician] Christine O’Donnell” and signs depicting Hitler mustaches on Republicans and conservative commentators, including Jewish Republican Eric Cantor. Ironically, the signs read “(in)sanity! and “afraid yet?”

Fact: Jon Stewart’s minions are the irrational ones stoking fear and hatred. It’s time he addressed this on his show. If Stewart does not address and condemn those signs, then he shows who he truly is: a highly partisan, self-righteous hack filled with hatred toward those with whom he disagrees, all the while pretending to be against hatred and irrationality. The hypocrisy is unbelievable, since the only ones stoking false fears and irrationality are those pretending to be against them! You can’t make this up.

Related: Apparently there are more hateful signs that were allowed into the rally, such as “Death to Right Wing Extremists (but in a nice way),” some people who were either pro-pedophilia or making a “joke” about a sickening and evil act of child abuse (not surprising coming from liberals since Stewart makes light of the evil organization NAMBLA which advocates pedphilia, on his show. It’s not funny.), God hates ideologues (no He doesn’t, because then He’d hate everyone since everyone has a philosophy, but He does hate the self-righteousness at this damned rally), and of  course leftists calling people “teabaggers” and “crazy” and implying that people who believe in God “hear voices” and are therefore crazy. Hat tip, and for more photos, see: DirectorBlue

Progressive "tolerance" by a Jon Stewart fan. Calling good bad, and bad good is normal for these folk.

Progressive "tolerance" by a Jon Stewart fan. Calling good bad, and bad good is normal for these folk.


God hates this guy's hypocrisy and false sign. Oh and the self-righteousness too. That other sign is so... what's the word... classy! Only a classy person would hold that sign. But in all seriousness this guy wouldn't know God if He was right in front of him in the flesh. It's funny how leftists use the rhetoric of religion for their hatred toward others but really don't believe in God.

God hates this guy's hypocrisy and false sign. Oh and the self-righteousness too. That other sign is so... what's the word... classy! Only a classy person would hold that sign. But in all seriousness this guy wouldn't know God if He was right in front of him in the flesh. It's funny how leftists use the rhetoric of religion for their hatred toward others but really don't believe in God. Another socialist from decades ago did that, too, and he had a very small mustache.

When are Huffington Post, Rolling Stone, and the Daily Show going to repudiate such hatred? I’m hearing crickets. The crickets are chirping because deep down all the partisan media that promoted this leftist, extremist march agree with these signs. But shhhh it’s a secret. You see, they’re “rational” and “moderate.”

Related: Michelle Malkin blogs about awesome conservative women; Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning

Update: In another article from Yahoo! News, Stewart said at the rally “came to play nice. He decried the ‘extensive effort it takes to hate’ and declared ‘we can have animus and not be enemies.” Note to Stewart: preach this to your sycophantic drone followers. Also, where was this “rally for sanity” when the insane left was calling Bush “Hitler” for years (and still do occasionally) even though his policies–pro-life, anti-terror–are the opposite of Nazi policies?

Jon Stewart Finally Acknowledges Media Bias: Case Study: Acorn

Thursday, September 17th, 2009

Hot Air has the video of Jon Stewart talking about the recent scandal involving Acorn, the taxpayer-funded criminal organization that signs up fake people for registering to vote and apparently also looks the other way when people pose as pimps of underage girls! These Acorn criminals are SICK AND EVIL! This is the same organization that Obama was and is involved with funding and has many connections to.

Stewart finally acknowledges that the biased media was scooped by two college-aged students. Many in the media have ignored the story as well! Crazy. Insane. I like how sometimes, sometimes John Stewart cuts through the BS in many of the news stories. He sometimes adds some of his own though, because of his more leftist bias, but still he often has some good points. I don’t like how he often gets pretty crude though, but I do like also how he often has serious authors on his show rather than just celebrities.

Also Michelle Malkin covers the NY Times’ biased coverage.

Boycotting the MTV Music Video Awards

Sunday, September 7th, 2008

I started to watch the MTV Music Video Awards, even though I know it’d be a mockery of anything rational or sacred. The host, Russell Brand, mocked George W. Bush as a “retarded cowboy,” even though Bush may not be the best speaker but is billions of times more intelligent than this idiotic, limp-wristed Russell Brand. Brand couldn’t pass any course at Yale, not even Home Ec. 

Brand started off the night by pleading for Americans to vote for Obama, saying, and I quote, “for the world!” At least he’s admitting that most Europeans want Obama to be elected because he will hurt America. Brand is a sexist, too, stating that Palin is a “VPILF,” or Vice President I’d Like to… Fondle?” Brand later hinted he himself was a pedophile, which caused the morally-depraved masses to laugh. Sick and evil. Let’s send this lowlife idiot back across the pond.

Who is this idiot to tell us how to vote, when he’s not a citizen? Of course it’s the rich media elites who are puppeteering him across the stage. It’s strange how big city elites think they can tell others how to vote.

Michelle Malkin has some interesting info. on the awards show, too.

Related: Reasons NOT to vote for Obama

R. Kelly Follows Satan, not Jesus

Friday, June 13th, 2008

CBS Chicago has news of R. Kelly being acquitted on all 14 accounts of child pornography. Sick. He was ON TAPE having sex with a 13-year-old. How much more proof do you need? According to his lower-than-a-pimple-on-the-belly-of-a-snake lawyer Ed Genson, the defense team is “ecstatic.” Justice denied.

Defense attorney Sam Adam Jr. said all he heard from Kelly during that time was “Thank you, Jesus. Thank you, Jesus. Thank you, Jesus.”

Minutes later, surrounded by bodyguards, Kelly left the courthouse, with dozens of fans screaming and cheering as he climbed into a waiting SUV.

Kelly did not speak to reporters, but a spokesperson for the singer, Allen Mayer, relayed the message that he was grateful to the jury and grateful to God.

R. Kelly has Satan to thank for this, not God. God hates child pornography, as it’s pure evil. People have to be responsible for their actions; otherwise evil, instead of good, is promoted.

“This has been a terrible ordeal for him and his family,” Mayer said. “And at this point all he wants to do is move forward and try to put it behind him.”

Assistant Cook County State’s Attorney Shauna Boliker would not say she was disappointed with the decision, saying a successful prosecution requires “the heart of the victim.”

Kelly’s defense team said the alleged victim’s absence helped acquit the singer.

“Because there was no victim. That’s the point. There is no victim. And the fact of the matter is there wasn’t a victim on that tape,” Genson said.

Terrible ordeal for him? What about the 13-year-old he peed on in the video? What a selfish piece of crap. As for that disgusting “lawyer” Ed Genson, yes, there was a victim. It’s on the tape. You have to be denying reality to say there was no victim on the tape. That is pure evil.

Of course the unthinking mob outside shouts for this guy… what a bunch of animals. No remorse, no common sense.

More Illegal Alien Murderers

Wednesday, August 15th, 2007

Michelle Malkin has a good post about another illegal alien let out of prison who then murders someone. Sickening. One of the murderers was out of jail on bail on bond for raping a child, Newt Gingrich points out. Says Malkin:

Will the execution-style murder of three young students in Newark, N.J., finally turn the tide in the immigration enforcement debate? Will we at last abandon the deadly, chaotic, lawless sanctuary nation experiment and restore America’s lost status as a sovereign nation under the rule of law?

Barack Obama: Just Another Liberal

Tuesday, June 19th, 2007

I knew Obama was liberal but not this liberal, leftist, in terms of abortion is expected to be able to toe the lockstep leftism of abortion on demand, but crime and punishment in regards to gands and pedophiles was a surprise as the media often portrays him as a moderate which he’s not. Check out the article from Human Events.

One example:

He voted against a bill that would add penalties for crimes committed as a part of gang activity and against a bill that would make it a criminal offense for accused gang members, free on bond or probation, to associate with other gang members. In 1999, he was the only state senator to oppose a bill that prohibited early prison release for criminal sexual offenders.

Search for Sicko Illegal who Raped Girl

Tuesday, April 10th, 2007

Syracuse Police are searching for a sick animal who raped an 11-year-old girl.   Let’s hope they find him.

The Predators of YouTube

Wednesday, November 29th, 2006


There’s a disturbing trend on YouTube/Google/Blogger (Google owns both YouTube and Blogger).  If your video is conservative and critiques Islamic fascism, it may be blocked, like Michelle Malkin’s did.  If you point out “fauxtography” and how some of the media faked missile strikes in Lebanon, like the Jawa Report did, it may get banned as well.

If you’re pro-life and want to simply show photos of a disabled kid who desperately needs help and prayers, then a British Court may tell Blogger to remove the site.  And Blogger will happily agree.

If your video critiques Democrats’ appeasement strategy, like the “Scary Movie” Director’s video did, it may be censored by YouTube as well see here or here or here. UPDATE: I found it on YouTube so it appears YouTube caved into pressure.

Google donates heavily to liberal causes (98 percent to Democrats). Google blocked an ad for an anti-Clinton book. Google News includes Jihadist sources, but refuses to carry Little Green Footballs blog!

The censorship of videos about reasonable debate relating to various policies on Iraq, Lebanon, or the censorship of blogs that just want to show photos of a disabled child so that her plea might be heard are just one side of this evil scheme.  It’s not just what they censor—things that shouldn’t be censored—but what they allow.  (YouTube.com is not a government entity and can censor whatever they want as a private company, but it does discredit them when their partisan and extremely disgusting policies are brought to light.) 

Let’s see a few videos that they do allow, some of which have been removed by the user but some that have not. If your video shows how to break into a house, then no problem, as this article from the Evening Standard points out:

Householders were warned today to check their security in an alert sparked by video website YouTube. Hundreds of videos are available on the site showing users how to pick locks, which experts fear will result in a spate of burglaries. The films were uncovered in an investigation by Which? magazine and sparked calls for YouTube to remove them from the site.

A film showing how to make the tools needed to pick locks, has been viewed more than 60,000 times.

If you’re in a gang, then your video may be on YouTube as well, as Michelle Malkin points out.

Of course, the various terrorist propaganda footage can be seen on YouTube as well.

And if you’re a damn pedophile promoting pedophilia you may have a blog on Blogger.com (also owned by Google), as World Net Daily pointed out.

So let’s get this right: Google bans a pro-life Blogger account that simply wants to show photos of a disabled child that needs prayers, but allows a site promoting pedophilia?

If it was an actual site with porn it would be prosecuted of course and taken down, but sites promoting it have been allowed by Google/Blogger, although it shouldn’t be.

I was recently notified of a similar trend on YouTube.  Young girls post videos of themselves online, then predators post comments on the videos.  Here’s a few video stills of videos that predators have commented on:


Parents! Why are you letting your children post videos online??   

Some comments from predator sickos.  

Some, like “NaturalEars,” have fought back and reported the predators to YouTube  

You can see the profile of the sickos who leave the comments, like this predator.

You can also click on their profiles and they have their “favorites” listed.  This predator has videos he selected as his “favorites” that are inappropriate for him.  

This girl’s video has some sick comments posted by predators.

Why aren’t these predators’ accounts deleted?

   This video is of a cute 8-year-old dancing.  It’s seemingly innocent and the video owner probably meant it that way.

But the comments are evil and disgusting.  Cute butt?  SHE’S AN 8-YEAR-OLD you damn pedophile! 



  Two videos that are not so innocent.


 Many of these posters are not fellow teenagers but are old men.  Sick.

 Many of these posters are not fellow teenagers but are old men.  Sick.Some of the videos, those of girls that are about 10-13, even have a “warning” sign that you are about to view restricted material that may be inappropriate for some viewers!  The point of those warnings is to warn minors not to view them, as it is ADULT material.  But when the people in the video are MINORS then it is not an adult video!  If it’s sexual then it should be banned. But this one is just a group of girls dancing.

This video had a “warning” before viewing it.  Why?  It’s a bunch of young girls dancing.  If it’s only appropriate for adults shouldn’t it be removed since it’s contents are children, and not adults?

Some sickos post comments while one points out their age.

two girls hanging out. 

More sick comments from predator losers.

This is a video of a FIFTH GRADER.


YouTube also has a “favorites” feature, where you can list your favorite videos.  Most of these predators have a lot of videos of young girls, some in the shower, some dancing, listed as their favorites.
For example, on “superdancer” predator’s profile, you can see that one of his “favorites” he designated is a video of two girls in a shower, who look about 10.  




Then you can see his sick comment about the video.  Super hot?  Will someone please arrest “superdancer”?  Then he can have some fun in jail.

The most vile and digusting and straight-up evil comments I read on YouTube were those about a video of a SIX YEAR OLD sucking on a lollipop. 

Here are video stills from the video, I have blacked out the girl’s face in all but one of the photos.





SICK SICK SICK SICK.  These men are 19, 36, 47… according to their YouTube profiles.  Most of them have a long list of “favorite” videos of young girls and “subscribed” video profiles.  Notice that “Johnnyojohnny” profile also left a sick comment on another young girl’s profile.  Where is the FBI?  This is enticing a child to commit sex acts, a crime! 

Here’s a few screenshots of their profiles:




A profile titled, “OoMyGoodness” left one of the sick comments about the 5th grader.  Then this woman in the video left a comment BACK on his profile:

As if that is funny.  It’s not!  Enticing a child to commit sex acts is a crime!  And this woman left a comment, “Lol” which means “laugh out loud.”  It’s not funny.

Do you know this woman?  According to her profile her name is Jamie.  If so you should immediately contact the police.  This six-year-old girl is in danger.  “Jamie” put a video of this girl “Chastity” sucking a lollipop and then she giggles as if it’s suggestive.  She then puts it online and lets predators leave evil comments, and then she leaves comments back on their profiles.

I already contacted the FBI about this.  The video has been since taken down thankfully.  But what about those predators?  Enticing a child to commit sex acts is a crime.  The FBI should get YouTube to turn over their data to get the IP addresses of those predators who left the comments and arrest them.  They could also pretend to be underage girls and put fake videos up, videos that are of 18 year olds but pretend to be younger, and then wait for the predators to post comments.  Then pretend to be an underage girl and pretend to meet them in real life.  Then arrest the predators. 

Maybe perverted justice organization needs to use YouTube as well and not just Yahoo chat to catch predators.

Preying on children is evil.  Children are too young to make those decisions and should be protected.  Predators should be locked up in jail for the rest of their miserable lives. 

So dow can YouTube fix all of this?  As for teenage videos, follow MySpace’s example and enable people to make their videos private and that can only be embedded with a special code only the video owner knows.  That way the teenager that wants to have a video on her private myspace profile can have a private video only viewable to her approved friends.

Ban all videos that show people how to become criminals, such as how to pick a lock. Ban all videos that are trying to recruit kids into gangs.  There are no constitutional issues here, as YouTube is a private company.  Ban all videos that spread jihadist propaganda.  There’s a difference between being biased and neutral.  Being completely neutral means you don’t care if terrorists blow up a disco in Israel.  Being completely neutral means you are indifferent, and therefore the opposite of good.  Allow reasonable videos from both liberal and conservative viewpoints to be hosted on YouTube.  Ban all videos that promote pedophilia, rape, incest, and ban all profiles of predators who leave evil comments, and turn the IP information of those users over to the FBI.  Only then would it gain its credibility back. 

We should all not rest until every predator is in jail, and children are safe from this evil.

Here’s some useful links:

FBI’s Innocent Images Initiative

Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection

National Center for Missing and Exploited Children

If anyone contacts the predators on YouTube and figures out who they are, be sure to contact the FBI or your local law enforcement agency.

YouTube temporarily blocks conservative video ad

Sunday, October 15th, 2006

World Net Daily points out how YouTube temporarily blocked an anti-Clinton adminsitration ad by using a warning, even though there wasn’t anything close to being offensive in regards to sexual, violent or explicit content on it.

They have also banned conservative videos, videos critical of Islam, and videos by Michelle Malkin.

And now they’ve been aquired by Google, an organization that has given overwelmingly to liberals.

Google has also refused to remove a blog on its blogger.com site, that advocates man/boy love, run by predators and perverts.

Robert Cox of the Examiner points out how many social networking and search sites–technorati, google, youtube, six apart, rss and podcasting–are all owned by liberals and this may become troublesome to conservatives’ freedom of speech. Michelle Malkin was recently threatened with a deleted account because her videos were deemed “offensive” for being conservative by YouTube.com.

So if you upload a video of American soldiers being killed, don’t worry; but if you stray from the lockstep liberal orthodoxy and make a conservative video, then watch out–that’s just too much common sense.

Mark Foley is a Sicko

Tuesday, October 3rd, 2006

Mark Foley is a disgusting piece of crap. ABC News just reports that this pedophile chatted with an underage boy during a House vote. He has disgraced the entire nation. He resigned, but he should also be put behind bars. What a sicko.

What’s worse, it looks like other Republicans AND Democrats knew or had an idea about it going on, and the FBI was even informed and did nothing! The Miami Herald, Fox News, and St. Pete Times sat on the story, doing nothing. Too many people have gotten apathetic when they hear about this sickening stuff. Perhaps the Democrats waited until it was close to election time to bring it up, or perhaps the Republicans didn’t want to deal with it. If ANYONE had an idea about it, they should resign as well as face possible criminal charges of not reporting a crime.